Friday, October 7, 2011

A thought on the probability (?) of Romney's nomination--a caveat

Watching the talking heads analyze the various Republican cat fights, squalls and rhubarbs in an effort to drum up some drama about the assorted root crops that are running for the GOP nomination is an exercise in tedium.  

So I skimmed Daily Kos and came across an article jubilantly entitled something like "Why Obama's Election to a Second Term Should Be A Cakewalk."  (In the context of recent political history "cakewalk" fairly drips with unintended irony).  

I really didn't read the article, but my sense was that the author was arguing that the Republican base just don't like Romney 'cuz he's not a Christian, he's a Mormon, besides being a librul socialist on health care.  

Well, that's as may be.  The purity of Romney's opportunism shines for us lefty political junkies like the light refracted through a first water diamond.  

I'm not sure the Tea Party and the Christian Right (to the extent that they are distinct phenomena, that is, hardly at all) really *care* about Romney's political amorality and utter lack of consistency.   Well, they *do* care for the time being, and many of them also care that he is a Mormon.  

But if the choice is between Romney and Obama, remember two things

1) of all of Obama's potential opponents, Romney is the most slippery fish, the most polished, the smoothest, canniest operator & fast talker...despite his fairly frequent gaffes about which his potential electorate care exactly...nothing...AND

2) People often don't go to the polls to vote *for* somebody, they go to vote *against* somebody else & this may be especially true with respect to Obama.  

(Actually, I don't really feel nervous about this--yet I think I should be...) 

R. 
 
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Growing stuff...

Dear FB friends and others with an interest in gardening and horticulture, I seek guidance and comments on my project as described below: 

I am trying to create a miniature orchard on 2 1/2 acres of relatively undeveloped land about 53 miles from my home.  I have water from a community water well and could have electricity although I don't feel an absolute need for the latter at the moment.  

I propose to have 20-40 fig trees, a like number of loquats, pineapple guavas, papaya and a few each of pawpaw, black mulberry, persimmon, pomegranate, Paulownia, vitex, wax myrtle, osage orange and willow (osier).  

I'm starting trees from seed or cuttings in a makeshift nursery in my back yard with a view to not spending much money on nursery stock.  Eventually, I will likely buy a few named varieties as a source of grafts for the loquats and pineapple guavas.  I won't have to do that for the figs and possibly not for the papayas.  

In preparing the land for transplanting the trees, my initial idea was to use a permaculture technique known as *hugelkultur* that involves planting the trees on mounds or along the top of "dikes."  Said mounds and dikes are made by putting down first a layer of tree trimmings, logs, firewood, untreated scrap lumber, etc.. Then comes the thickest layer, of compost and/or leaf and lawn clippings.  Next comes a thin layer of manure, preferably well rotted.  Finally the whole thing is topped off with a few inches of topsoil.   Ideally, the height of these structures should be 3'-5' & the steeper the sides the better.  All of the materials except the topsoil are readily available free locally for the price of the gasoline for transport.  Sometimes a body can even find free topsoil.  

The reason for doing this is to avoid having to hire heavy equipment or use arduous hand labor.  My soil is reasonably fertile but has a great deal of heavy clay.  Dry or wet, it is exceedingly difficult to dig out.  To be sure, getting the hugelkultur materials in place is going to be labor intensive, but nothing like trying to tackle that clay.  Besides most of these fruit trees like good drainage and there are many places where the land just doesn't have it.  I want to avoid the expense of hiring heavy equipment and besides, I want to be the sole *auteur* as much as possible.  

The further (alleged) advantages of hugelkultur is that the elevation provides a temperature of 3-5 degrees above the ambient temperature during cold weather, and the rotting wood at the bottom traps water and lessens the need for irrigation during dry spells.  

But what about deer, rabbits and possibly voles, field mice and gophers?  Of these, deer are the biggest problem.   Deer probably won't like the fig trees or the papaya that much, but when they are hungry they will eat anything.  

To address that and possibly cut down on some of the labor,  I am now thinking that I could stock up on free pallets that the seem to be readily available and use them to build large, box-like "containers" by nailing together four standard wooden pallets, preferably 40" by 48," made of wood that has not been chemically treated but heat treated only.    Since the main fruit trees are relatively shallow-rooted, I would only partially fill up the containers with the hugelkultur materials--no more than about two feet at the most.  In a couple of years, since the roots *are* shallow, it might be necessary to put a gently sloping berm of compost all around the containers and replenish it from year to year.  If smaller varmints other than deer are a consideration, I guess I could lay down chicken wire in the bottom of the containers before adding the hugelkultur materials and possibly a skirt of chicken wire around the perimeter to keep out rabbits.  

Ah, but you say, these plants are subtropical and tropical and there are freezes in central Texas, and these plants require full sun, don't they?  As seedlings in an enclosure, would they get enough sunlight?  

Well, I think so.  It seems to me that much horticultural information and advice assumes the environment is that of the northern U.S.  But I've seen well-watered plants that require "full sun" completely done in by our brutal Texas summers.  My loquat, fig and pineapple seedlings seem to appreciate the protection they receive from the partial shade that obtains on the east side of the house.  

The seedlings would get filtered sunlight through the pallet slats in the early morning and toward sunset but get a fair amount of overhead sun the rest of the day.  

The slight elevation and the enclosure would provide some protection to the plants during cold weather.  Papaya is the most frost tender, but will usually survive even freezes if they are not of long duration.  Even if the cold kills the foliage, the papaya can still come back from the root and stems

What is critical for both papaya and loquats, if they are to fruit, is that the flowers must not be killed during a cold snap.  The tree may survive but will not fruit if the flowers are killed.  Even temperatures as high as 42 degrees F will kill papaya   They flower in February.  Loquats flower in late winter or early spring.  If a cold snap goes down to 29F or less, it will kill loquat flowers and no loquat fruit.  (They are really good, BTW.)

I have two possible solutions, to be used singly or in combination, during the critical flowering period.  There is on the market a stuff called Freezpruf.  One sprayed application works for 6 weeks or 12 weeks--I forget which.  It is claimed that it is like moving your plants 200 miles south, i.e., into another temperature zone.  I'm in zone 8 and that would put me in subtropical zone 9--like the much of the Gulf Coast.   One could also drape greenhouse plastic over the entirely of the tree or seedling also. 

I'm hoping the hype about Freezpruf is true & would appreciate hearing from anybody who has used it. 

Well, you may ask, why do I want to do this if I have no serious intention of making any money?    And I will spare everybody the details of my proposed rose garden, ornamental perennial garden, herb garden, salsa garden, the luffa trellis, dye plant garden and fiber plant garden, all to be planted in the interstices and odd spaces of the orchard. Oh.  And I also want to grow a few of those timber bamboo the Japanese use to make shakaguchi (sp?) flutes.  Never mind that traditional Japanese flutemakers serve an apprenticeship lasting 15 years and also devote much of their time to developing the skills needed to pick out just the right sort of bamboo root. 

Well, I would have plenty of fruit & stuff and I could take pictures and spend my advancing years painting watercolors of my Eden. I could be a wannabe Manet.    My heirs could have it eventually as long as they promised not to trust any talking snakes.  

Best case scenario is the orchard would start bearing fruit in 8-10 years while I am still at least capable of picking the low hanging fruit. 

So why do it?  Well, why not?  I could use the exercise. 

And I am an optimist.  

R. 










 
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, October 4, 2011

Music for a Desert Island...

I don't sit around all day listening to Brahms.   Maybe I'll put him on four or five times a year.  But if I was marooned on a desert island with only one piece of music, the one I would want would be his first symphony--although I like virtually everything he's ever done (that I've heard).  Includes all four symphonies and a few shorter pieces.  I thought this particular clip was especially wonderful because of the sound quality and the conductor.   It's a very pleasing visual because she is relatively young and projects both serenity and happiness in a very mature way.   Brahms in his own day was often dissed a little as a Beethoven clone.  I can see where people could do that--I guess because of the choice of instrumentation?  But to me they are radically different overall.   I shall now deliver myself of the kinds of generalizations I sometimes see in music criticism--which may be meaningless but which satisfy some inner need:    In Beethoven the will is in the service of the passions, in Brahms the passions are in the service of the will...So there. 

P.S.  I don't think I've ever seen a woman conductor of a symphony orchestra before even in the media.

P.P.S.  I would be curious as to other people's choice of music for that hypothetical desert island...


R. 




 
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, July 6, 2011

Sun Tzu and the Art of War

Idea for a quasi-polemical pamphlet or short book: Write a commentary and/or
paraphrase Sun Tzu's *The Art of War* in political terms that advance the cause
of the Left.

There's precedent for such an undertaking. Gramsci's commentary on
Machievelli's *The Prince* was essentially a coded guide for Communists to
follow in the course of the class struggle. Of course he wrote it in such a
way to get it past Mussolini's censors, who apparently did not understand the
subversion involved--I guess because Gramsci was writing about an icon of
Italian history. (There is no way of phrasing a program or an idea in such a
way that it cannot be subverted or put to ill use. Grover Norquist, the
anti-tax ideologue who is one of the dominant forces in the Republican Party,
admired Gramsci for his tactics and supposedly has adopted them in his efforts
to bring back the Gilded Era of plutocracy and child labor)

It seems to me that Sun Tzu's *Art of War* is well suited for such exploitation.

A lot of his language can easily be taken as symbolic, at least by a Western
sensibility, and there is also the benefit that in his view the best victories
are those that involve the least (or no) bloodshed.

I believe there are already such books that are adapted for those who want to
pursue success in business.

I don't want to do it myself because 1) I am too lazy and 2) it is too hard.
But somebody ought to try it. Or maybe somebody has already done it. I don't
know.

I do have a few more ideas or suggestions:

One can think of the project as a sort of like Lenin's *What is to be Done*--but

as if it were written by a Taoist, charged with a non-denominational mystical
humanism, an aversion to authoritarianism and a passion--not for secrecy, but
for anonymity. Have the locals name themselves after specific events in the
history of human liberation rather than individual heroes--for instance,
Colorado Miners' Strike of 19__ Memorial Chapter. Or Battle of Harper's
Ferry Memorial Study Group...whatever. The "mystical humanism" so referenced
should be broad enough to accommodate both militant atheists and sympathetic
persons from almost any religious background.


One of the difficulties with Marxism as an inspiring text for action is that its

terms are abstract and, when stated, invite debate. As a tool of analysis and
explanation, Marxism may be adequate for the public sphere of intellectual
discourse, but at the level of persuading people to adopt a certain orientation
toward society, a more poetic presentation is needed.

A model that combines something of AA, the IWW, a Friends meeting and the
Mondragon co-op movement is what I have in mind. An organization that is at
once a source of meaningful committment, a springboard for political action at
several levels, and that serves practical, social and spiritual needs at the
local level... The last time I looked at the IWW Constitution, I remember
thinking that it is almost ideal in its inclusiveness and sensitivity to
individual freedom--but there's a certain ritualism in words like "fellow
worker" and "One Big Union" that somehow ring hollow outside the organization...

I would say that perhaps something could be done with the online social
networking sites, but if we might enter an era where face-to-face contact gets
to be at a premium somehow & that the organization could be a resource for...

Despite invoking AA, IWW, and the Friends, I think there has to be some kind of
parallel channel beyond action based on pure consensus--although it has been
pointed out that consensus does not necessarily mean that everybody has to be
perfectly happy about a decision.

Oh, well. It's just a thought.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Re: No Second Childhood for Me!

I read some version of this a while ago and have been pushing my intake ever since. Did you see this?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/05/03/study-pundits-wrong-most-_n_856886.html I can't vouch for the method, but the results make sense. It is vindicating but hardly consoling that Krugman comes out on top, since he thinks we're going to hell in a hand-basket, but my greater pleasure is that Friedman is down near the bottom. Even if he were predicting the weather, I would find his portentousness unbearable. 

On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Roy Griffin <roygg9@yahoo.com> wrote:
Although some in my real-time reference group are probably willing to suggest I
have merely prolonged my first one.

Every great once in a while, somebody drags out a study that shows coffee is bad

for you.  It is invariably later contradicted by a later study.

I had heard the below before, but this is icing on the cake.  I'm down to about
five or six a day.   All my habits, good and bad, seem to have weakened their
grip.  I hope I'm drinking enough.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504095630.htm

R.

P.S.  I wonder if anybody has checked the Alzheimer rates in Brazil.   I read
once that there folks drink an average of about 15 cups per day.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/


No Second Childhood for Me!

Although some in my real-time reference group are probably willing to suggest I
have merely prolonged my first one.

Every great once in a while, somebody drags out a study that shows coffee is bad

for you. It is invariably later contradicted by a later study.

I had heard the below before, but this is icing on the cake. I'm down to about
five or six a day. All my habits, good and bad, seem to have weakened their
grip. I hope I'm drinking enough.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504095630.htm

R.

P.S. I wonder if anybody has checked the Alzheimer rates in Brazil. I read
once that there folks drink an average of about 15 cups per day.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

Daily Show & Colbert Report & other

Old news, but in case anybody missed it, Stewart & Colbert were side-splittingly
funny last night on the subject of how the announcement of bin Laden's demise
was announced.

Colbert referenced Seth Meyer's joke at the White House Press dinner about bin
Laden hosting a late night talk show on C-span and Obama laughing just a tad too
hard...well--I guess you had to have been there, but the visual cracked me up.

On another note, Chris Matthews was interviewing a biographer of Obama's mother
& the biographer remarked that Obama lived in Java from the ages of 6 YO to 10
YO and that she thought that could be the source of Obama's notorious
self-control. She also said that in that regard some Indonesians had told her
that it was an Indonesian character trait--that is, it was very important to
maintain control of one's emotions at all times.

That sounds like something that could be true--although I did not know that was
supposed to be characteristic of Indonesians until the biographer remarked upon
it.

My prejudice is usually to side with the more social-based explanation for
somebody's personality, but I feel contrarian about that particular
explanation. Until people--probably a lot of people--write in-depth
biographies and analyses of Obama's background, that seems like something
unknowable--maybe even after they do.

I'm allowing myself to fall into the preoccupations of the hagiographers
regarding Obama, so I can't complain too much about how MSNBC (excepting Joe
Scarborough, but who cares?) is practically ready to canonize the guy. But I
think I will complain in a few days if the spell doesn't lift a bit.

Wasn't Kate's dress beautiful?

R.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Wednesday, April 27, 2011

Aw, say it ain't so...& regarding latest "birther" news.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1379844/Science-world-buzzing-rumours-elusive-God-particle-found.html


If the foregoing turns out to be true and they have indeed found the Higgs
bosun, I may have to give up my deepest cosmological beliefs and concede that
the Standard Model is correct & endure the taunts and jeers of my children, as
well as that of my sane, orthodox-cosmology-believing friends and peers. Oh,
well. I am optimistic that rationalization can find a way.

In other news, Obama has caused the release of his long-form birth certificate
in an apparent attempt to placate the birthers. (Orly Whatserface has already
said the certificate is not valid because it says "African" instead of "Negro.")

Daily Kos is rejoicing because over there they believe that by releasing his
birth certificate, knowing that the diehard birthers still won't believe him,
Obama has shrewdly kept the issue alive to the detriment of the Republican
Party. I believe (and hope) Daily Kos is right.

That said, I also rather wish he had not done it. But since he has, my Inner
Stalinist (and also my Inner Blood Feudin' Texan) rather hopes that just this
once, Obama would show a mean, vindictive streak. Perhaps in his second term,
he could make the dreams of *those people* come true. Declare martial law and
ship 'em off to FEMA camps.

(In the spirit of Jon Kyl's famous remark, the preceding paragraph contains
assertions that are not intended to be factual.)

R.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Thursday, April 21, 2011

Could It Have Worked?

A few weeks ago on Facebook I pronounced a "geas" on the Republican
Congressional leadership to the effect that they would be unable to lie.
("Geas" is Irish for "curse," "hex," "spell," "supernatural obligation," etc.)

Then Paul Ryan announced the Republican plan for the budget--thereby revealing
the True Essence of Republican politics and putting them in the...soup.

So. My geas worked. Didn't it?

(Perhaps I should add another that Republican presidential contenders would
forever be unable to tell the full truth about Obama's birthplace and religious
committments--but at this point that would be like King Canute telling the
breakers to recede at just the right moment...)

Any way, my Inner Polyanna (whom I have nicknamed Zoe w/the two dots over the
"e") has got the better of Ebenezer (my gloomy Inner Puritan). Perhaps because
Nate Silver, cold-eyed statistician of 535.com,, has indicated there's a good
chance the Democrats could recapture the House in 2012.

R.

P.S. I should add that the name "Zoe" has nothing to do with Zooey Deschanel or
the Zooey of *Franny and Zooey*--although both the singer and the book are among
my favorites.

P.P.S. Considering the efficacy of my geas it would be wise to avoid messing
with *moi.*

P.P.P.S. I know it's too early to be thinking about 2016, but I believe I will
be ambulatory and reasonably sound of body (all things considered), and as sane
as I've always been--therefore, I will continue to think about Alan Grayson.
The man is an Ivy Leaguer with a working-class background who made his own
millions. He has something of a specialty with gerontological issues. He has
five children. I have no doubt he will have to trim his sails some, but he has
spoken truth to power. He is Jewish. In 2016, after Obama, I feel that it is
possible that is a fact that will actually work for him politically--which is to
say that most or all of his enemies on that basis will be the the *right*
enemies.

And if there be bimbos in the woodwork, let them come forth now and be explained
or otherwise be brushed aside as "old news." But please. Not while his wife is
sick with some dire illness.



http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Friday, April 15, 2011

Homeopathy? Conscious Universe? Marfa lights?

(N.B. Claire--Prof. Zizzi likes horses).

I don't know whether I want to add it to my list of recreational beliefs or
not--it seems there could be dire consequences if there is nothing to it and
people take it seriously. I would hate to contribute to a public health hazard.

(The truth or falsity of the Big Bang theory doesn't affect anybody's daily
life--except mine. It's merely a random obsession I have blundered into).

But the article below *is* fascinating. Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, the

man who discovered the HIV virus, has published experiments that seem to support

the ideas of homeopathy.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/luc-montagnier-homeopathy-taken-seriously_b_814619.html

Moreover some of his work suggests that DNA leaves a "quantum imprint" in the
water in which it has been suspended.

I believe the author of the article is a practicing homeopathic healer, and
moreover appears in the Huffington Post. Huffington Post is a good source of
political opinion and an excellent source of fascinating gossip, but I fear they

are a tad lacking in discrimination with respect to some New Age and alternative

medicine views.

The article also brings in support from a couple of other Nobel Prize winners,
namely Jacques Benveniste and Brian Josephson. I believe James Randi's
"exposure" of Jacques Benveniste was a set-up. Josephson has a well-protected
academic position but he is also subjected to quite a bit of professional
ostracism.

Of course, Nobel Science laureates are not the last word in truth. William
Shockley, the transistor guy was a notorious racist--but he was speaking out of
his field. There is another Nobel science laureate, whose name I don't know,
who is a vehement climate change denier.

Turning to Paola Zizzi and her "Big Wow" theory. She is a theoretical physicist

who thinks that at some point during the "inflation" of the Universe, the
Universe became conscious and, if I understand her correctly (which I may not),
"decided" to stop inflating so fast. She bases this on some calculations
involving the number of certain particles that were in play as compared to the
number of certain fluctuations that are possible in the human brain. Or
something like that.

http://quantum.ibiocat.eu/eng/index.php?pagina=42

I like Zizzi's theory insofar as it seems compatible with Alfred North
Whitehead's "panpsychism" or "panexperientialism"--but she seems to assume the
truth of the Big Bang theory. (If I understand correctly, she arrived at her
position in pursuit of a theory of "quantum loop gravity." So there.

Lastly, recently I rather vehemently denied that all of the Marfa lights could
be explained as refractions of headlights on a distant highway. I didn't recall
why I was so sure so I checked--contrary to what Wikipedia says, astronomers
from MacDonald observatory some years ago did a study, with videos & controls
and everything and found that indeed, they cannot be explained completely as car
headlights.

In July 1989, scientists from McDonald Observatory on Mount Locke outside Fort
Davis, and from Sul Ross University, decided to conduct another investigation
into the lights. Included in the group were a professor of chemistry, Dr.
Avinash Rangra, and an astronomer, Dr. Edwin Barker. Doctor Rangra confirmed
that something of natural origin was occurring over Mitchell Flats outside
Marfa, but he did not know what. All he could say for certain was that it was
not man-made.

Also, the Wiki article, if I remember correctly stated that there had been no
sightings during world war II when there was an active air base nearby.
"Unsolved Mysteries" ran a segment a few days ago that contradicted the Wiki
article.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Recreational Belief System (RBS) and Obama's budget speech

Lots of support for my recreational belief system (stuff I believe for the fun
of it) on the Cosmic Ancestry website below:

http://www.panspermia.org/whatsnew64.htm

Includes a rebuttal (April 7th entry) by Dr. Richard B. Hoover to those who
doubt that the forms found on the meteorite are microfossils of extraterrestrial
bacteria.

Howard Fineman said on the news that Obama seems genuinely angry at Paul Ryan's
proposal to destroy Medicare. I thought so too. Normally, Fineman is
extremely careful not to say anything he can't back out of pretty easily.

Obama has found presidential campaign gold in taking on the Ryan Plan to Destroy
the Social Safety Net. The Democrats in the House could spin some gold of their
own with it. As always, though, there's the question: will the Democrats find
a way to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory?

Reality check: It seems to me that now even more than before that any real or
threatened shutdown of the government by the Republicans would be a total
disaster for them politically-and for everybody if they actually do shut down
the country for more than a couple of days.

Whatchall think?

R.

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Re: [a-train] Overcoming Obama disappointment...

Interesting. I don't know if I'll end up voting for him or not.  Count me among those who believe that (by any fair, dispassionate calibration of the political spectrum) he has has moved substantially right of center.  I'll spare you the list of issues (eg, he's to the right of the most Repubilcans on Afghanistan and the Pentagon budget), because they're all over the web.
  But I know in the primaries I'll be looking for a more progressive alternative.  If we don't do that. seems to me, we're tacitly conceding that Obama defines  the left edge of viable politics, and he spends another 4 years saying "yeah, they piss and moan over on the left, but never do anything about it-- the folks who'll hurt me if I don't compromise with them are on the right."
  We have to stop giving so much away in electoral politics.
On Apr 5, 2011, at 5:38 PM, Roy Griffin wrote:

There are two reasons why I'm going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt in 
2012 and vote for him: 1) Nobody in this country can get elected unless they 
have already made substantial compromises with the status quo, overtly or 
otherwise, so perhaps the best we can hope for is that the candidate won't be 
absolutely hideous (which is certainly the alternative in 2012 and 2) a more 
complicated and more salient reason is that Obama, within the boundaries of the 
necessarily conventional framework he assumes, is trying to do what's best for 
the country--something in which the alternative candidates do not show the 
slightest interest--only right wing ideology and lip service. I base this 
partially on the fact that Obama does in fact often *ignore* the Left--even when 
the polls show that the public is *with* the Left. Richard Wolfe, the MSNBC 
journalist and author of an Obama campaign biography (his is *about* the 
campaign and not a product of it), emphasized Obama's amazing ability to tune 
out all the media and pundit hype, whether or the Right or the Left, and make 
decisions solely on whatever his internal criteria are for the good of the 
country. I think those internal criteria, whatever they are, have been 
mistaken sometimes, and Wolfe has been panned by many of my favorite lefty 
bloggers on Digby and Daily Kos as a conventional Washington "villager" and 
Beltway pundit, which I suppose he is, but I don't see him engaging in the kind 
of hyperbole and hasty generalization I see coming from the likes of Chris 
Matthews--or the overly cautious he said/she said style one gets from others...

Those of us who are in some sense on the Far Left, at least as per Michelle 
Bachmann or Sarah Palin, need to look somewhere other than to electoral politics 
to create more fundamental change. I believe that would be a movement based on 
building alternative institutions and working within other progressive 
movements, such as the unions, environmental groups, civil rights organizations, 
community organizing outfits, etc. 

Which is not to say that electoral politics should be neglected altogether. We 
should look to build alliances, wherever possible, with the least of whatever 
evils are available. 

R. 

http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

__._,_.___
RECENT ACTIVITY:
    .
     
    __,_._,___

    Overcoming Obama disappointment...

    There are two reasons why I'm going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt in
    2012 and vote for him: 1) Nobody in this country can get elected unless they
    have already made substantial compromises with the status quo, overtly or
    otherwise, so perhaps the best we can hope for is that the candidate won't be
    absolutely hideous (which is certainly the alternative in 2012 and 2) a more
    complicated and more salient reason is that Obama, within the boundaries of the
    necessarily conventional framework he assumes, is trying to do what's best for
    the country--something in which the alternative candidates do not show the
    slightest interest--only right wing ideology and lip service. I base this
    partially on the fact that Obama does in fact often *ignore* the Left--even when
    the polls show that the public is *with* the Left. Richard Wolfe, the MSNBC
    journalist and author of an Obama campaign biography (his is *about* the
    campaign and not a product of it), emphasized Obama's amazing ability to tune
    out all the media and pundit hype, whether or the Right or the Left, and make
    decisions solely on whatever his internal criteria are for the good of the
    country. I think those internal criteria, whatever they are, have been
    mistaken sometimes, and Wolfe has been panned by many of my favorite lefty
    bloggers on Digby and Daily Kos as a conventional Washington "villager" and
    Beltway pundit, which I suppose he is, but I don't see him engaging in the kind
    of hyperbole and hasty generalization I see coming from the likes of Chris
    Matthews--or the overly cautious he said/she said style one gets from others...

    Those of us who are in some sense on the Far Left, at least as per Michelle
    Bachmann or Sarah Palin, need to look somewhere other than to electoral politics
    to create more fundamental change. I believe that would be a movement based on
    building alternative institutions and working within other progressive
    movements, such as the unions, environmental groups, civil rights organizations,
    community organizing outfits, etc.

    Which is not to say that electoral politics should be neglected altogether. We
    should look to build alliances, wherever possible, with the least of whatever
    evils are available.

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Saturday, April 2, 2011

    Watched *Inception*

    Wow.

    Although I think I missed the details of the motivation for the protagonist's
    wife for not wanting to return to real reality (but Teresa clued me in), I did
    manage to follow the rest of the plot eventually. Just don't ask me what it is
    *now.*

    I have had several of those "dream within a dream" experiences four or five
    years ago and I did wake up a tad nervous.

    Watching it I thought of both *Adaptation* (recursive plot) and *What Dreams May
    Come* (dreams as reality--post-mortem in that case).

    Interesting since I've been rifling through books dealing with physics &
    consciousness & the possible objective (though extradimensional) reality of
    DMT, shamanic, alien abduction and near-death experiences--which posit a certain
    independence of consciousness from neurological states.

    The movie approaches one aspect of that issue: namely, the degree to which
    consciousness requires an Other or an Outside in order to express itself. I'm
    referring the central theme about how difficult it is for a consciousness to
    make up something completely "whole cloth" on its own...

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Thursday, March 31, 2011

    Re: Better Off Ted...

    Another in the "brilliant but cancelled" genre.  Well, if not brilliant, at least "quite good but cancelled."  

    On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 2:09 PM, Roy Griffin <roygg9@yahoo.com> wrote:
    I had vaguely heard of this, but didn't know anything about it.  I saw that my
    daughter had started watching it on my netflix streaming account & decided to
    try it out.  Perhaps y'all are already familiar with it but my first impression
    was that this was a hoot.   This show has the same kind of zany & shameless gags
    a bit like Scrubs--but there's a lot of clear satire about evil corporations
    that appeals to us highly moral & political junkie types...the satire also
    provides a thread to hang the gags on...

    (I can't fault zany & perhaps rather stoopid gag shows like *Scrubs* for being
    what they are--I laugh at the gags sometimes, but I can rarely sit through a
    whole show.   The show exists for the sake of the gags and it becomes somewhat
    like what W.H. Auden said about the *Importance of Being Earnest*--a sort of
    spoken word-only opera--except with *Scrubs it's an opera of spoken-word cum
    sight gags--and perhaps it's not quite as brilliant as Oscar Wilde's play.)

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/


    Better Off Ted...

    I had vaguely heard of this, but didn't know anything about it. I saw that my
    daughter had started watching it on my netflix streaming account & decided to
    try it out. Perhaps y'all are already familiar with it but my first impression
    was that this was a hoot. This show has the same kind of zany & shameless gags
    a bit like Scrubs--but there's a lot of clear satire about evil corporations
    that appeals to us highly moral & political junkie types...the satire also
    provides a thread to hang the gags on...

    (I can't fault zany & perhaps rather stoopid gag shows like *Scrubs* for being
    what they are--I laugh at the gags sometimes, but I can rarely sit through a
    whole show. The show exists for the sake of the gags and it becomes somewhat
    like what W.H. Auden said about the *Importance of Being Earnest*--a sort of
    spoken word-only opera--except with *Scrubs it's an opera of spoken-word cum
    sight gags--and perhaps it's not quite as brilliant as Oscar Wilde's play.)

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Monday, March 21, 2011

    Of Libya, Illusions & Obama

    I secretly harbored many of the same hopes about Obama as any moderately fervent


    Obamista--although my head told me (and keeps reminding me still) that real
    change comes about from grassroots movements. Politicians can usually do little


    more than ratify progressive change.

    I haven't turned against Obama particularly, despite his continual tendency to
    "split the difference" between, say, the spirit of the Clinton Administration
    and the spirit of the Reagan Administration. What else can you expect?

    (If you're disillusioned with Obama, go back and listen to an interview with
    George W. Bush on Youtube).

    FDR embodied both the prophetic charisma of a grassroots leader and the canny
    calculation of a political functionary who is more priest than prophet. In this


    latter aspect, FDR compromised with the Southern racists of his own party,
    interred Japanese Americans, and at first inhibited his own New Deal program
    with the typical ruling elite concern about inflation. Not to mention the
    failure to do more to address the plight of the German Jews prior to World War
    II. But who knows what the real political possibilities of the time were?

    Juan Cole, in his blog, Informed Comment, has expressed conditional, but strong


    support of U.S. participation in the Libya operation. I believe he is the
    single most trustworthy voice about the situation in the Arab countries. (He's
    a professor of Mideast studies at U Michigan. He is fluent in Arabic and Farsi
    and has lived in the Middle East. Interestingly, he comes out of the Bahai
    religious tradition that originated in Iran--although he has distanced himself
    from the mainstream Bahai community. His specialty is history of religion, with


    emphasis on the Mideast.)

    Josh Marshall, of the blog Talking Points Memo, a cautious, moderately liberal
    Democrat and canny observer of the domestic political scene, who is pretty far
    from being Michael Moore, has come out strongly against it. He is fearful of
    an Iraq or Afghanistan-style quagmire.

    One of my FB friends, who seems to tentatively support the Libya involvement,
    observed there's another kind of quagmire to worry about: Even if the U.S. &
    NATO operation is successful in ousting Quadaffi (sp?) and allowing a reform
    regime to come to power (maybe *especially* if successful) there may be a clamor


    elsewhere in the Arab world from reform forces for intervention on *their* side.


    Refusal would be perceived as hypocrisy and betrayal.

    I initially supported the military action in Afghanistan. Now, despite the
    official optimism emanating from Afghanistan, I don't see where our presence
    benefits the Afghan people.

    I was also suckered by the John Edwards campaign.

    Nevertheless, like my FB friend, I *tentatively* support U.S. involvement in
    Libya at the level stated by official policy. Foreign policy "realism" as
    expressed by Josh Marshall--well, I'm sure he means only a moderate dose of it
    and also a type of it that tips more toward isolationism rather than
    intervention--but it seems to me that foreign policy "realism" of any kind
    slides too easily into a realpolitik that has led to a lot of grief in the
    world.

    (BTW, I think it may be difficult for the U.S. & NATO to meet *all* the
    "conditions" listed by Juan Cole.)

    If the U.S. involvement in Libya turns out to be a disaster, there is one small
    consolation: I believe it is safe to say that Obama's actions in that regard
    were based on some kind of careful, rational calculation rather than something
    his "gut" told him.

    Anyway, Josh Marshall and Juan Cole's thoughts on Libya are below:

    http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/03/at_the_end_of_last.php#more?ref=fpblg


    http://www.juancole.com/

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Wednesday, March 9, 2011

    All except the last two lines

    of this poem were too graphic for me to put in print:

    And may they never again
    Be re-elected


    Here's a bit of public reaction to Wisconsin's Republican legislature's measure
    to strip public employees of their collective bargaining rights:


    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3b-bS7BGoE&feature=player_embedded


    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Food blog of interest

    An old friend of mine, Judy Ramey, unseen by me for many years, has a food
    blog.

    It's at http://web.me.com/judithramey/Eat!/Welcome.html

    She has lately added a weekly menu. I hope she keeps it up. Like the Moosewood
    cookbooks, the menus are oriented toward healthy eating but in a casual,
    catch-as-catch-can sort of way. (But it's not a vegetarian blog)

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Monday, March 7, 2011

    Panspermia! (Even if you don't care)

    http://journalofcosmology.com/Life100.html

    100 or so scientists have been invited to scrutinize the findings in this paper.

    If it is confirmed that there are microfossils of non-terrestrial origin in the
    referenced meteorites, it greatly increases the probability that life is as
    common as dirt in the universe (metaphorically speaking).

    My own prejudice is that life is as fundamental to the universe (or multiverse,
    megaverse or whatever) as space, time, gravity, matter and energy.

    And if this prejudice should pan out, I believe that it indirectly casts doubt
    on the Big Bang origin of the universe. But I feel to lazy to try and connect
    *those* dots right now. Not that I have the scientific and mathematical
    expertise to do so any way.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Any of you who in Texas or who have strong connections there...

    Would you please post the link below on your FB page, your blog or any place
    where you have a presence on the Internet (and where it would not be
    inappropriate)--that is, if you agree that people carrying concealed weapons on
    college campuses in Texas is a bad idea.


    http://www.causes.com/causes/587954

    The Texas Lege in its peculiar wisdom is considering a bill to allow students to

    carry concealed weapons on campus.

    Only the Tennessee legislature is crazier. There people may carry concealed
    weapons into restaurants and bars. (Incidentally, I noticed in passing an
    internet entry to the effect that there is no legal definition of a bar in
    Tennessee).

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Tuesday, February 22, 2011

    Chris Matthews: An appreciation

    He finally said something interesting--maybe even mildly subversive: Whereas,
    pretty much "everybody" presently agrees that Quadaffi is criminally insane,
    where has "everybody" been the past 40 years?

    I wonder what everybody will be saying when the House of Saud goes down? (This
    last is my remark)

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Insanity in the Texas Lege Redux

    Once again the Texas Legislature is poised to pass legislation that would permit
    carrying firearms on college campuses.

    I live near the University of Texas campus.

    The idea of a bunch of hard-partying students having ready access to
    weapons--not to mention hard-partying frat rats--is...nervous-making.

    It's fucking crazy is what it is. The Republican legislators need to wipe the
    cowshit off their shoes--or maybe clean it out of their brains.

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/

    Friday, February 11, 2011

    Good for Egypt.--revolution in the West? Nah.

    Perhaps the U.S. could have done better in the situation, but it is a certainty
    it could have done far worse.

    I believe it is possible our great-grandchildren or perhaps *their* children
    might see something like what we could consider to be an international order
    consisting mostly of acceptably democratic socialist states...or cultures...or
    something...

    It may be that many of the countries and regions that are now in the catbird
    seat--even those like China we now consider as up-and-coming--will become
    relative backwaters, (That could become literally true if the Far Right in
    this country and other political forces elsewhere contrive to block sufficient
    amelioration of global warming and its effects)

    I don't know if anything can happen quicker in the more technologically advanced
    and nominally democratic societies. It seems to me that if a political
    establishment can manage to make a sufficient number of people reasonably
    comfortable then the calculus will always be against "revolution," whether
    peaceful or violent. Perhaps I'm wrong.

    Assuming people in the U.S, are not much worse off economically than they are
    now, is it possible to imagine any realistic scenario that would turn the
    citizens out in the U.S. out in the street against the status quo in such
    numbers (as in Egypt) that the status quo would be undone or even threatened? I
    dunno.

    R.

    http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/


    ____________________________________________________________________________________
    Bored stiff? Loosen up...
    Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
    http://games.yahoo.com/games/front