Friday, October 7, 2011
A thought on the probability (?) of Romney's nomination--a caveat
Growing stuff...
Tuesday, October 4, 2011
Music for a Desert Island...
Wednesday, July 6, 2011
Sun Tzu and the Art of War
paraphrase Sun Tzu's *The Art of War* in political terms that advance the cause
of the Left.
There's precedent for such an undertaking. Gramsci's commentary on
Machievelli's *The Prince* was essentially a coded guide for Communists to
follow in the course of the class struggle. Of course he wrote it in such a
way to get it past Mussolini's censors, who apparently did not understand the
subversion involved--I guess because Gramsci was writing about an icon of
Italian history. (There is no way of phrasing a program or an idea in such a
way that it cannot be subverted or put to ill use. Grover Norquist, the
anti-tax ideologue who is one of the dominant forces in the Republican Party,
admired Gramsci for his tactics and supposedly has adopted them in his efforts
to bring back the Gilded Era of plutocracy and child labor)
It seems to me that Sun Tzu's *Art of War* is well suited for such exploitation.
A lot of his language can easily be taken as symbolic, at least by a Western
sensibility, and there is also the benefit that in his view the best victories
are those that involve the least (or no) bloodshed.
I believe there are already such books that are adapted for those who want to
pursue success in business.
I don't want to do it myself because 1) I am too lazy and 2) it is too hard.
But somebody ought to try it. Or maybe somebody has already done it. I don't
know.
I do have a few more ideas or suggestions:
One can think of the project as a sort of like Lenin's *What is to be Done*--but
as if it were written by a Taoist, charged with a non-denominational mystical
humanism, an aversion to authoritarianism and a passion--not for secrecy, but
for anonymity. Have the locals name themselves after specific events in the
history of human liberation rather than individual heroes--for instance,
Colorado Miners' Strike of 19__ Memorial Chapter. Or Battle of Harper's
Ferry Memorial Study Group...whatever. The "mystical humanism" so referenced
should be broad enough to accommodate both militant atheists and sympathetic
persons from almost any religious background.
One of the difficulties with Marxism as an inspiring text for action is that its
terms are abstract and, when stated, invite debate. As a tool of analysis and
explanation, Marxism may be adequate for the public sphere of intellectual
discourse, but at the level of persuading people to adopt a certain orientation
toward society, a more poetic presentation is needed.
A model that combines something of AA, the IWW, a Friends meeting and the
Mondragon co-op movement is what I have in mind. An organization that is at
once a source of meaningful committment, a springboard for political action at
several levels, and that serves practical, social and spiritual needs at the
local level... The last time I looked at the IWW Constitution, I remember
thinking that it is almost ideal in its inclusiveness and sensitivity to
individual freedom--but there's a certain ritualism in words like "fellow
worker" and "One Big Union" that somehow ring hollow outside the organization...
I would say that perhaps something could be done with the online social
networking sites, but if we might enter an era where face-to-face contact gets
to be at a premium somehow & that the organization could be a resource for...
Despite invoking AA, IWW, and the Friends, I think there has to be some kind of
parallel channel beyond action based on pure consensus--although it has been
pointed out that consensus does not necessarily mean that everybody has to be
perfectly happy about a decision.
Oh, well. It's just a thought.
Thursday, May 5, 2011
Re: No Second Childhood for Me!
Although some in my real-time reference group are probably willing to suggest I
have merely prolonged my first one.
Every great once in a while, somebody drags out a study that shows coffee is bad
for you. It is invariably later contradicted by a later study.
I had heard the below before, but this is icing on the cake. I'm down to about
five or six a day. All my habits, good and bad, seem to have weakened their
grip. I hope I'm drinking enough.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504095630.htm
R.
P.S. I wonder if anybody has checked the Alzheimer rates in Brazil. I read
once that there folks drink an average of about 15 cups per day.
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/
No Second Childhood for Me!
have merely prolonged my first one.
Every great once in a while, somebody drags out a study that shows coffee is bad
for you. It is invariably later contradicted by a later study.
I had heard the below before, but this is icing on the cake. I'm down to about
five or six a day. All my habits, good and bad, seem to have weakened their
grip. I hope I'm drinking enough.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110504095630.htm
R.
P.S. I wonder if anybody has checked the Alzheimer rates in Brazil. I read
once that there folks drink an average of about 15 cups per day.
Tuesday, May 3, 2011
Daily Show & Colbert Report & other
funny last night on the subject of how the announcement of bin Laden's demise
was announced.
Colbert referenced Seth Meyer's joke at the White House Press dinner about bin
Laden hosting a late night talk show on C-span and Obama laughing just a tad too
hard...well--I guess you had to have been there, but the visual cracked me up.
On another note, Chris Matthews was interviewing a biographer of Obama's mother
& the biographer remarked that Obama lived in Java from the ages of 6 YO to 10
YO and that she thought that could be the source of Obama's notorious
self-control. She also said that in that regard some Indonesians had told her
that it was an Indonesian character trait--that is, it was very important to
maintain control of one's emotions at all times.
That sounds like something that could be true--although I did not know that was
supposed to be characteristic of Indonesians until the biographer remarked upon
it.
My prejudice is usually to side with the more social-based explanation for
somebody's personality, but I feel contrarian about that particular
explanation. Until people--probably a lot of people--write in-depth
biographies and analyses of Obama's background, that seems like something
unknowable--maybe even after they do.
I'm allowing myself to fall into the preoccupations of the hagiographers
regarding Obama, so I can't complain too much about how MSNBC (excepting Joe
Scarborough, but who cares?) is practically ready to canonize the guy. But I
think I will complain in a few days if the spell doesn't lift a bit.
Wasn't Kate's dress beautiful?
Wednesday, April 27, 2011
Aw, say it ain't so...& regarding latest "birther" news.
If the foregoing turns out to be true and they have indeed found the Higgs
bosun, I may have to give up my deepest cosmological beliefs and concede that
the Standard Model is correct & endure the taunts and jeers of my children, as
well as that of my sane, orthodox-cosmology-believing friends and peers. Oh,
well. I am optimistic that rationalization can find a way.
In other news, Obama has caused the release of his long-form birth certificate
in an apparent attempt to placate the birthers. (Orly Whatserface has already
said the certificate is not valid because it says "African" instead of "Negro.")
Daily Kos is rejoicing because over there they believe that by releasing his
birth certificate, knowing that the diehard birthers still won't believe him,
Obama has shrewdly kept the issue alive to the detriment of the Republican
Party. I believe (and hope) Daily Kos is right.
That said, I also rather wish he had not done it. But since he has, my Inner
Stalinist (and also my Inner Blood Feudin' Texan) rather hopes that just this
once, Obama would show a mean, vindictive streak. Perhaps in his second term,
he could make the dreams of *those people* come true. Declare martial law and
ship 'em off to FEMA camps.
(In the spirit of Jon Kyl's famous remark, the preceding paragraph contains
assertions that are not intended to be factual.)
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Could It Have Worked?
Congressional leadership to the effect that they would be unable to lie.
("Geas" is Irish for "curse," "hex," "spell," "supernatural obligation," etc.)
Then Paul Ryan announced the Republican plan for the budget--thereby revealing
the True Essence of Republican politics and putting them in the...soup.
So. My geas worked. Didn't it?
(Perhaps I should add another that Republican presidential contenders would
forever be unable to tell the full truth about Obama's birthplace and religious
committments--but at this point that would be like King Canute telling the
breakers to recede at just the right moment...)
Any way, my Inner Polyanna (whom I have nicknamed Zoe w/the two dots over the
"e") has got the better of Ebenezer (my gloomy Inner Puritan). Perhaps because
Nate Silver, cold-eyed statistician of 535.com,, has indicated there's a good
chance the Democrats could recapture the House in 2012.
R.
P.S. I should add that the name "Zoe" has nothing to do with Zooey Deschanel or
the Zooey of *Franny and Zooey*--although both the singer and the book are among
my favorites.
P.P.S. Considering the efficacy of my geas it would be wise to avoid messing
with *moi.*
P.P.P.S. I know it's too early to be thinking about 2016, but I believe I will
be ambulatory and reasonably sound of body (all things considered), and as sane
as I've always been--therefore, I will continue to think about Alan Grayson.
The man is an Ivy Leaguer with a working-class background who made his own
millions. He has something of a specialty with gerontological issues. He has
five children. I have no doubt he will have to trim his sails some, but he has
spoken truth to power. He is Jewish. In 2016, after Obama, I feel that it is
possible that is a fact that will actually work for him politically--which is to
say that most or all of his enemies on that basis will be the the *right*
enemies.
And if there be bimbos in the woodwork, let them come forth now and be explained
or otherwise be brushed aside as "old news." But please. Not while his wife is
sick with some dire illness.
Friday, April 15, 2011
Homeopathy? Conscious Universe? Marfa lights?
I don't know whether I want to add it to my list of recreational beliefs or
not--it seems there could be dire consequences if there is nothing to it and
people take it seriously. I would hate to contribute to a public health hazard.
(The truth or falsity of the Big Bang theory doesn't affect anybody's daily
life--except mine. It's merely a random obsession I have blundered into).
But the article below *is* fascinating. Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier, the
man who discovered the HIV virus, has published experiments that seem to support
the ideas of homeopathy.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dana-ullman/luc-montagnier-homeopathy-taken-seriously_b_814619.html
Moreover some of his work suggests that DNA leaves a "quantum imprint" in the
water in which it has been suspended.
I believe the author of the article is a practicing homeopathic healer, and
moreover appears in the Huffington Post. Huffington Post is a good source of
political opinion and an excellent source of fascinating gossip, but I fear they
are a tad lacking in discrimination with respect to some New Age and alternative
medicine views.
The article also brings in support from a couple of other Nobel Prize winners,
namely Jacques Benveniste and Brian Josephson. I believe James Randi's
"exposure" of Jacques Benveniste was a set-up. Josephson has a well-protected
academic position but he is also subjected to quite a bit of professional
ostracism.
Of course, Nobel Science laureates are not the last word in truth. William
Shockley, the transistor guy was a notorious racist--but he was speaking out of
his field. There is another Nobel science laureate, whose name I don't know,
who is a vehement climate change denier.
Turning to Paola Zizzi and her "Big Wow" theory. She is a theoretical physicist
who thinks that at some point during the "inflation" of the Universe, the
Universe became conscious and, if I understand her correctly (which I may not),
"decided" to stop inflating so fast. She bases this on some calculations
involving the number of certain particles that were in play as compared to the
number of certain fluctuations that are possible in the human brain. Or
something like that.
http://quantum.ibiocat.eu/eng/index.php?pagina=42
I like Zizzi's theory insofar as it seems compatible with Alfred North
Whitehead's "panpsychism" or "panexperientialism"--but she seems to assume the
truth of the Big Bang theory. (If I understand correctly, she arrived at her
position in pursuit of a theory of "quantum loop gravity." So there.
Lastly, recently I rather vehemently denied that all of the Marfa lights could
be explained as refractions of headlights on a distant highway. I didn't recall
why I was so sure so I checked--contrary to what Wikipedia says, astronomers
from MacDonald observatory some years ago did a study, with videos & controls
and everything and found that indeed, they cannot be explained completely as car
headlights.
In July 1989, scientists from McDonald Observatory on Mount Locke outside Fort
Davis, and from Sul Ross University, decided to conduct another investigation
into the lights. Included in the group were a professor of chemistry, Dr.
Avinash Rangra, and an astronomer, Dr. Edwin Barker. Doctor Rangra confirmed
that something of natural origin was occurring over Mitchell Flats outside
Marfa, but he did not know what. All he could say for certain was that it was
not man-made.
Also, the Wiki article, if I remember correctly stated that there had been no
sightings during world war II when there was an active air base nearby.
"Unsolved Mysteries" ran a segment a few days ago that contradicted the Wiki
article.
Thursday, April 14, 2011
Recreational Belief System (RBS) and Obama's budget speech
of it) on the Cosmic Ancestry website below:
http://www.panspermia.org/whatsnew64.htm
Includes a rebuttal (April 7th entry) by Dr. Richard B. Hoover to those who
doubt that the forms found on the meteorite are microfossils of extraterrestrial
bacteria.
Howard Fineman said on the news that Obama seems genuinely angry at Paul Ryan's
proposal to destroy Medicare. I thought so too. Normally, Fineman is
extremely careful not to say anything he can't back out of pretty easily.
Obama has found presidential campaign gold in taking on the Ryan Plan to Destroy
the Social Safety Net. The Democrats in the House could spin some gold of their
own with it. As always, though, there's the question: will the Democrats find
a way to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory?
Reality check: It seems to me that now even more than before that any real or
threatened shutdown of the government by the Republicans would be a total
disaster for them politically-and for everybody if they actually do shut down
the country for more than a couple of days.
Whatchall think?
Tuesday, April 5, 2011
Re: [a-train] Overcoming Obama disappointment...
There are two reasons why I'm going to give Obama the benefit of the doubt in
2012 and vote for him: 1) Nobody in this country can get elected unless they
have already made substantial compromises with the status quo, overtly or
otherwise, so perhaps the best we can hope for is that the candidate won't be
absolutely hideous (which is certainly the alternative in 2012 and 2) a more
complicated and more salient reason is that Obama, within the boundaries of the
necessarily conventional framework he assumes, is trying to do what's best for
the country--something in which the alternative candidates do not show the
slightest interest--only right wing ideology and lip service. I base this
partially on the fact that Obama does in fact often *ignore* the Left--even when
the polls show that the public is *with* the Left. Richard Wolfe, the MSNBC
journalist and author of an Obama campaign biography (his is *about* the
campaign and not a product of it), emphasized Obama's amazing ability to tune
out all the media and pundit hype, whether or the Right or the Left, and make
decisions solely on whatever his internal criteria are for the good of the
country. I think those internal criteria, whatever they are, have been
mistaken sometimes, and Wolfe has been panned by many of my favorite lefty
bloggers on Digby and Daily Kos as a conventional Washington "villager" and
Beltway pundit, which I suppose he is, but I don't see him engaging in the kind
of hyperbole and hasty generalization I see coming from the likes of Chris
Matthews--or the overly cautious he said/she said style one gets from others...
Those of us who are in some sense on the Far Left, at least as per Michelle
Bachmann or Sarah Palin, need to look somewhere other than to electoral politics
to create more fundamental change. I believe that would be a movement based on
building alternative institutions and working within other progressive
movements, such as the unions, environmental groups, civil rights organizations,
community organizing outfits, etc.
Which is not to say that electoral politics should be neglected altogether. We
should look to build alliances, wherever possible, with the least of whatever
evils are available.
R.
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/__._,_.___.__,_._,___
Overcoming Obama disappointment...
2012 and vote for him: 1) Nobody in this country can get elected unless they
have already made substantial compromises with the status quo, overtly or
otherwise, so perhaps the best we can hope for is that the candidate won't be
absolutely hideous (which is certainly the alternative in 2012 and 2) a more
complicated and more salient reason is that Obama, within the boundaries of the
necessarily conventional framework he assumes, is trying to do what's best for
the country--something in which the alternative candidates do not show the
slightest interest--only right wing ideology and lip service. I base this
partially on the fact that Obama does in fact often *ignore* the Left--even when
the polls show that the public is *with* the Left. Richard Wolfe, the MSNBC
journalist and author of an Obama campaign biography (his is *about* the
campaign and not a product of it), emphasized Obama's amazing ability to tune
out all the media and pundit hype, whether or the Right or the Left, and make
decisions solely on whatever his internal criteria are for the good of the
country. I think those internal criteria, whatever they are, have been
mistaken sometimes, and Wolfe has been panned by many of my favorite lefty
bloggers on Digby and Daily Kos as a conventional Washington "villager" and
Beltway pundit, which I suppose he is, but I don't see him engaging in the kind
of hyperbole and hasty generalization I see coming from the likes of Chris
Matthews--or the overly cautious he said/she said style one gets from others...
Those of us who are in some sense on the Far Left, at least as per Michelle
Bachmann or Sarah Palin, need to look somewhere other than to electoral politics
to create more fundamental change. I believe that would be a movement based on
building alternative institutions and working within other progressive
movements, such as the unions, environmental groups, civil rights organizations,
community organizing outfits, etc.
Which is not to say that electoral politics should be neglected altogether. We
should look to build alliances, wherever possible, with the least of whatever
evils are available.
Saturday, April 2, 2011
Watched *Inception*
Although I think I missed the details of the motivation for the protagonist's
wife for not wanting to return to real reality (but Teresa clued me in), I did
manage to follow the rest of the plot eventually. Just don't ask me what it is
*now.*
I have had several of those "dream within a dream" experiences four or five
years ago and I did wake up a tad nervous.
Watching it I thought of both *Adaptation* (recursive plot) and *What Dreams May
Come* (dreams as reality--post-mortem in that case).
Interesting since I've been rifling through books dealing with physics &
consciousness & the possible objective (though extradimensional) reality of
DMT, shamanic, alien abduction and near-death experiences--which posit a certain
independence of consciousness from neurological states.
The movie approaches one aspect of that issue: namely, the degree to which
consciousness requires an Other or an Outside in order to express itself. I'm
referring the central theme about how difficult it is for a consciousness to
make up something completely "whole cloth" on its own...
Thursday, March 31, 2011
Re: Better Off Ted...
I had vaguely heard of this, but didn't know anything about it. I saw that my
daughter had started watching it on my netflix streaming account & decided to
try it out. Perhaps y'all are already familiar with it but my first impression
was that this was a hoot. This show has the same kind of zany & shameless gags
a bit like Scrubs--but there's a lot of clear satire about evil corporations
that appeals to us highly moral & political junkie types...the satire also
provides a thread to hang the gags on...
(I can't fault zany & perhaps rather stoopid gag shows like *Scrubs* for being
what they are--I laugh at the gags sometimes, but I can rarely sit through a
whole show. The show exists for the sake of the gags and it becomes somewhat
like what W.H. Auden said about the *Importance of Being Earnest*--a sort of
spoken word-only opera--except with *Scrubs it's an opera of spoken-word cum
sight gags--and perhaps it's not quite as brilliant as Oscar Wilde's play.)
R.
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/
Better Off Ted...
daughter had started watching it on my netflix streaming account & decided to
try it out. Perhaps y'all are already familiar with it but my first impression
was that this was a hoot. This show has the same kind of zany & shameless gags
a bit like Scrubs--but there's a lot of clear satire about evil corporations
that appeals to us highly moral & political junkie types...the satire also
provides a thread to hang the gags on...
(I can't fault zany & perhaps rather stoopid gag shows like *Scrubs* for being
what they are--I laugh at the gags sometimes, but I can rarely sit through a
whole show. The show exists for the sake of the gags and it becomes somewhat
like what W.H. Auden said about the *Importance of Being Earnest*--a sort of
spoken word-only opera--except with *Scrubs it's an opera of spoken-word cum
sight gags--and perhaps it's not quite as brilliant as Oscar Wilde's play.)
Monday, March 21, 2011
Of Libya, Illusions & Obama
Obamista--although my head told me (and keeps reminding me still) that real
change comes about from grassroots movements. Politicians can usually do little
more than ratify progressive change.
I haven't turned against Obama particularly, despite his continual tendency to
"split the difference" between, say, the spirit of the Clinton Administration
and the spirit of the Reagan Administration. What else can you expect?
(If you're disillusioned with Obama, go back and listen to an interview with
George W. Bush on Youtube).
FDR embodied both the prophetic charisma of a grassroots leader and the canny
calculation of a political functionary who is more priest than prophet. In this
latter aspect, FDR compromised with the Southern racists of his own party,
interred Japanese Americans, and at first inhibited his own New Deal program
with the typical ruling elite concern about inflation. Not to mention the
failure to do more to address the plight of the German Jews prior to World War
II. But who knows what the real political possibilities of the time were?
Juan Cole, in his blog, Informed Comment, has expressed conditional, but strong
support of U.S. participation in the Libya operation. I believe he is the
single most trustworthy voice about the situation in the Arab countries. (He's
a professor of Mideast studies at U Michigan. He is fluent in Arabic and Farsi
and has lived in the Middle East. Interestingly, he comes out of the Bahai
religious tradition that originated in Iran--although he has distanced himself
from the mainstream Bahai community. His specialty is history of religion, with
emphasis on the Mideast.)
Josh Marshall, of the blog Talking Points Memo, a cautious, moderately liberal
Democrat and canny observer of the domestic political scene, who is pretty far
from being Michael Moore, has come out strongly against it. He is fearful of
an Iraq or Afghanistan-style quagmire.
One of my FB friends, who seems to tentatively support the Libya involvement,
observed there's another kind of quagmire to worry about: Even if the U.S. &
NATO operation is successful in ousting Quadaffi (sp?) and allowing a reform
regime to come to power (maybe *especially* if successful) there may be a clamor
elsewhere in the Arab world from reform forces for intervention on *their* side.
Refusal would be perceived as hypocrisy and betrayal.
I initially supported the military action in Afghanistan. Now, despite the
official optimism emanating from Afghanistan, I don't see where our presence
benefits the Afghan people.
I was also suckered by the John Edwards campaign.
Nevertheless, like my FB friend, I *tentatively* support U.S. involvement in
Libya at the level stated by official policy. Foreign policy "realism" as
expressed by Josh Marshall--well, I'm sure he means only a moderate dose of it
and also a type of it that tips more toward isolationism rather than
intervention--but it seems to me that foreign policy "realism" of any kind
slides too easily into a realpolitik that has led to a lot of grief in the
world.
(BTW, I think it may be difficult for the U.S. & NATO to meet *all* the
"conditions" listed by Juan Cole.)
If the U.S. involvement in Libya turns out to be a disaster, there is one small
consolation: I believe it is safe to say that Obama's actions in that regard
were based on some kind of careful, rational calculation rather than something
his "gut" told him.
Anyway, Josh Marshall and Juan Cole's thoughts on Libya are below:
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2011/03/at_the_end_of_last.php#more?ref=fpblg
Wednesday, March 9, 2011
All except the last two lines
And may they never again
Be re-elected
Here's a bit of public reaction to Wisconsin's Republican legislature's measure
to strip public employees of their collective bargaining rights:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r3b-bS7BGoE&feature=player_embedded
Food blog of interest
blog.
It's at http://web.me.com/judithramey/Eat!/Welcome.html
She has lately added a weekly menu. I hope she keeps it up. Like the Moosewood
cookbooks, the menus are oriented toward healthy eating but in a casual,
catch-as-catch-can sort of way. (But it's not a vegetarian blog)
Monday, March 7, 2011
Panspermia! (Even if you don't care)
100 or so scientists have been invited to scrutinize the findings in this paper.
If it is confirmed that there are microfossils of non-terrestrial origin in the
referenced meteorites, it greatly increases the probability that life is as
common as dirt in the universe (metaphorically speaking).
My own prejudice is that life is as fundamental to the universe (or multiverse,
megaverse or whatever) as space, time, gravity, matter and energy.
And if this prejudice should pan out, I believe that it indirectly casts doubt
on the Big Bang origin of the universe. But I feel to lazy to try and connect
*those* dots right now. Not that I have the scientific and mathematical
expertise to do so any way.
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/
Any of you who in Texas or who have strong connections there...
where you have a presence on the Internet (and where it would not be
inappropriate)--that is, if you agree that people carrying concealed weapons on
college campuses in Texas is a bad idea.
http://www.causes.com/causes/587954
The Texas Lege in its peculiar wisdom is considering a bill to allow students to
carry concealed weapons on campus.
Only the Tennessee legislature is crazier. There people may carry concealed
weapons into restaurants and bars. (Incidentally, I noticed in passing an
internet entry to the effect that there is no legal definition of a bar in
Tennessee).
R.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Chris Matthews: An appreciation
pretty much "everybody" presently agrees that Quadaffi is criminally insane,
where has "everybody" been the past 40 years?
I wonder what everybody will be saying when the House of Saud goes down? (This
last is my remark)
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/
Insanity in the Texas Lege Redux
carrying firearms on college campuses.
I live near the University of Texas campus.
The idea of a bunch of hard-partying students having ready access to
weapons--not to mention hard-partying frat rats--is...nervous-making.
It's fucking crazy is what it is. The Republican legislators need to wipe the
cowshit off their shoes--or maybe clean it out of their brains.
Friday, February 11, 2011
Good for Egypt.--revolution in the West? Nah.
it could have done far worse.
I believe it is possible our great-grandchildren or perhaps *their* children
might see something like what we could consider to be an international order
consisting mostly of acceptably democratic socialist states...or cultures...or
something...
It may be that many of the countries and regions that are now in the catbird
seat--even those like China we now consider as up-and-coming--will become
relative backwaters, (That could become literally true if the Far Right in
this country and other political forces elsewhere contrive to block sufficient
amelioration of global warming and its effects)
I don't know if anything can happen quicker in the more technologically advanced
and nominally democratic societies. It seems to me that if a political
establishment can manage to make a sufficient number of people reasonably
comfortable then the calculus will always be against "revolution," whether
peaceful or violent. Perhaps I'm wrong.
Assuming people in the U.S, are not much worse off economically than they are
now, is it possible to imagine any realistic scenario that would turn the
citizens out in the U.S. out in the street against the status quo in such
numbers (as in Egypt) that the status quo would be undone or even threatened? I
dunno.
R.
http://gg9-tto.blogspot.com/
____________________________________________________________________________________
Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.
http://games.yahoo.com/games/front